Adult Western Flower Thrips (WFT, Frankliniella occidentalis)
Distribution
The WFT is native to southwestern North America but has spread throughout the United States and the world, becoming a major global pest in many cropping systems. EFT is native to eastern North America and is commonly found east of the Rocky Mountains, while TT is also widespread and can be found across much of the United States and Canada, primarily east of the Rockies.
While all three species (WFT, EFT, and TT) can occur and feed on foliage as adults, WFT is the only species that can successfully reproduce on tomato foliage. In fact, WFT has accounted for >95% of the total thrips collected from tomato foliage in NC, while EFT and TT make up a small fraction. These three species also all feed in tomato flowers. TT is primarily an early-season pest, typically present during the spring and disappearing from the system by late spring. EFT tends to outcompete WFT in flowers, especially early in the season, resulting in higher EFT: WFT ratios that decline as the season progresses. It is important to note that EFT does not transmit TSWV; therefore, a higher abundance of EFT, particularly when it outcompetes WFT, may contribute to reduced TSWV transmission compared to fields where WFT dominates.
While WFT is potentially the most damaging of the three species, it does not occur in significant numbers in all areas. On an areawide basis, it has an aggregated distribution; i.e., there are hot spots where high populations exist over time. These areas are frequently characterized by a sequence of flowering crops that serve as host bridges throughout the season. Spring wheat, peach flowers, strawberries, and vegetable crops (tomatoes, peppers and cucurbits) are crops that have been identified as important bridge crops. .
Fig. 1. Thrips species commonly found in vegetable production systems. (Photo: Jack Reed, Mississippi State University)
Identification
Because thrips species can differ in their behavior, potential impact, and how well they respond to control measures, identification is key to devising management strategies.
WFT: Adult WFT are about 1.2 to 1.5 mm long and range in color from pale yellow to light brown (Fig. 1). There can be variation in the color, depending on the degree of brown shading on the abdomen. They have narrow, fringed wings, often darker at the tips, and small bristle-like hairs on the tops of their bodies (pronotum).
EFT: Adult EFT tend to be smaller (about 1mm long) and more orange than WFT, and they lack the darker wing tips.
TT: Tobacco thrips are dark brown to blackish in color (noticeably darker than WFT and EFT, Fig. 1) and are present early in the season during spring.
WFT and EFT species can appear similar enough that a microscope and identification guide are often necessary to differentiate them. 50× magnification is sufficient to observe distinguishing features.
- Antennae: WFT and EFT both have 8-segmented antennae; however, in WFT, segment V is partially darkened in apical (distal) half and shows less contrast whereas in EFT, segment V is distinctly lighter than segments IV and VI (Fig. 1). Also, the length of segment VIII is 1.5X longer than VII in WFT (Fig. 2a), while the two segments are of equal length in the EFT (Fig. 2c). Also, the base (pedicel) of antennal segment III in WFT is smooth (Fig. 2b), while in EFT it is wider in the center, appearing angular (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2. Key microscopic features distinguishing WFT and EFT based on antennal morphology.
- Ocular setae: WFT has a pair of post-ocular setae (bristles behind the compound eye) that are as long as the distance between the hind ocelli (Fig. 3a), while EFT has post-ocular setae that are shorter than the distance between the hind ocelli (Fig. 3h). Also, the length of the ocular and post-ocular setae is about the same in WFT, while post-ocular setae are shorter in EFT.
Fig. 3. Key microscopic features distinguishing WFT and EFT based on ocular setae.
- Thoracic setae: On the thorax, the WFT anteromarginal (inner) and anteroangular (outer) are about equal length (Fig. 4b), but in EFT, the inner setae are shorter than the outer (Fig. 4i).
Fig. 4. Key microscopic features distinguishing WFT and EFT based on thoracic setae.
(Figures 2-4: Photos adapted from Funderburk et al. 2019, and this handout was prepared by Tom Bilbo, Ph.D., Clemson University)
Description and Life Cycle
WFT has six life stages: the egg, two motile larval stages, a prepupa, pupa stage, and the motile adult (Fig. 5). WFT females can lay 150-300 eggs over their lifetime. Eggs are tiny, smooth, and translucent, and are inserted into plant tissues such as leaves, bracts, or petals, making them difficult to detect. In fact, it is necessary to stain eggs and view them under a microscope.
The larval stages resemble the adult in size and shape, have red eyes, and actively feed on leaves and flowers. As they transition into prepupal and pupal stages, they stop feeding. Pupation typically occurs in the soil or growing media. During the pupal stage, wing buds become more pronounced, and the antennae fold back over the head, signaling the final phase before adulthood. Under warm conditions (around 86°F, or 30°C), development from egg to adult takes about 2 weeks. After emergence, the adult can live up to 4-5 weeks, continuing to feed and reproduce.
Fig. 5. Life cycle of western flower thrips. Source: https://www.biobee.com/pests/western-flower-thrips/
WFT can survive North Carolina winters as both adults and larvae, though reproduction slows during the coldest months. Populations are lowest in December and January but begin to build again by March and April as temperatures warm. Winter wheat and other grasses serve as overwintering hosts, allowing thrips to persist until spring crops are planted. While TT are usually more abundant on wild hosts, WFT are consistently present and ready to move into crops early in the season. In early spring, strawberries, oats, and wheat act as key hosts where WFT populations build up just before their dispersal to newly planted tomatoes and peppers in late spring and early summer.
Damage
Both larval and adult thrips cause damage to leaves, flowers and fruit. Damage to leaves results in a speckled appearance that, under large populations, can cause severe scarring (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Thrips feeding damage on tomato leaves. (Photos: Walgenbach lab, NCSU)
Damage to fruit can take several different appearances, depending on the species involved, when damage occurs, and the intensity of the population. Thrips will feed on pollen in tomato flowers, but they can also oviposit in small developing fruit before petals and stamens shed. These oviposition scars develop into small, darkened dimples as the fruit matures (Fig. 7A). On fruit, thrips feeding can cause gold flecking (Fig. 7B), as well as scarring and russeting when populations are large (Fig. 7C).
Fig. 7. A) Thrips oviposition scars on unripe fruit, B) gold fleck caused by thrips feeding, and C) scarring and russeting on mature fruits. (Photos: Steve Schoof and Jim Walgenbach, NCSU)
Indirect damage by transmission of TSWV can also take several forms, depending on the plant age when infected and the TSWV-resistance status of a plant. When a TSWV-susceptible cultivar is infected the first few weeks after planting, symptoms include stunting, blackening/bronzing of leaf tissue (Fig. 8A), and eventually death of the plant. Plants often do not die when they are infected as they become older, but leaf tissue becomes blackened along with classic discoloration and appearance of ringspots on fruit (Fig. 8A and 8B).
Fig. 8. A) Bronzing symptoms of TSWV on tomato leaves, B) TSWV symptoms on tomato fruit. (Photos: Inga Meadows and Jim Walgenbach, NCSU)
TSWV can be acquired by thrips (i.e., become viruliferous) only in the larval stage when feeding on an infected plant, but there is a latent period so that only adults can transmit the virus. Treating plants with imidacloprid just before setting in the field can reduce the incidence of TSWV spread early in the season, but host plant resistance is generally a more important management strategy. There are tomato cultivars that have been bred for resistance to TSWV, but the gene conferring resistance is limited to vegetative tissue, so it only provides protection against viruliferous thrips feeding on foliage. Thrips feeding in flowers can still transmit the virus to fruit, resulting in classic fruit symptoms.
It should be noted that the incidence of TSWV varies widely among years and locations. This is associated with the amount of inoculum in wild host plants early in the season, which is associated with the primary spread by thrips from weed hosts to crops. The level of inoculum is widely unpredictable; one cannot assume a high incidence in one year will lead to a high incidence the following year.
Management
Choosing the right management strategy depends on which thrips species are present and whether their numbers are above damaging levels. While identifying thrips in the field can be difficult, TT are easier to spot because they are dark brown to black, unlike WFT and EFT. Because EFT is much less of a pest than WFT, identification is important. They usually need to be examined under a microscope to differentiate. It is best to collect thrips in a small vial or jar containing 50% ethanol and have an expert identify them. One tell-tale sign that WFT is present is if you find reproducing populations on leaves, since EFT does not reproduce on foliage.
Monitoring
Yellow or blue sticky cards are useful for monitoring thrips flight activity and densities (Fig. 9). Sticky cards placed around the perimeter or outside of the field help detect area-wide dispersal events. For accurate monitoring to make management decisions, leaf and flower inspection is most useful.
For leaf inspection, choose plants at random across different parts of the field. Inspect older, fully expanded leaves (on the lower part of the plant), and look at the undersides of the leaves where thrips feed. Look for immature thrips, silvering or scarring on leaves (a sign of feeding), and black specks (thrips feces). For flower inspection, place an index card under a flower and tap the flower to remove thrips onto the card.
It is important to note that WFT reproduction on foliage primarily occurs in tomatoes, not peppers. Provisional action thresholds are an average of 1 to 2 immature thrips per tomato leaflet or >6 adult WFT per pepper flower.
Fig. 9. Yellow sticky cards for monitoring thrips populations in tomatoes.(Photo: Stephen Schoof, NCSU)
Biological control
There are numerous biological control agents (BCAs) such as minute pirate bugs, predacious mites, entomopathogenic fungi, and nematodes that can be incorporated into integrated pest management (IPM) programs. The most effective natural enemy of WFT is the insidious flower bug (Orius Insidiosus, Fig. 10), a species of minute pirate bug, which prefers to prey on WFT adults. These are more effective in peppers and eggplants than in tomatoes, because the bugs have difficulty navigating the dense trichomes on tomato foliage and entering flowers due to the structure of the stamens. Insidiosus flower bugs are particularly effective in suppressing WFT in pepper flowers when selective insecticides are used for the management of other pests.
Fig. 10. Insidious flower bug (Orius Insidiosus). (Photo: Melinda Gibbs, NCSU)
Cultural control
Cultural control involves practices like managing alternate hosts, such as weeds and grasses, where thrips can overwinter. Strawberries and wheat (and other small grain crops) are two key hosts that facilitate the buildup of WFT in the spring, just before they disperse to newly planted tomatoes when the grain crops dry down. Avoiding planting tomatoes adjacent to these spring reservoirs of WFT can help reduce the initial infestation intensity in vegetables. If crop removal before heading (with herbicides or disking the crop into the soil) is an option, that will also prevent thrips buildups.
Another approach to avoid or delay WFT infestations in fruiting vegetables is using ultraviolet (UV)-reflective mulches (Fig. 11). Reflective mulches interfere with thrips' ability to locate host plants, making them less likely to settle on crops. These are more effective early in the crop before the canopy covers the mulch and reduces its reflective surface. An added benefit is that reflective mulches can lower WFT populations in flowers, where they are difficult to control even with insecticides. This can also help to suppress transmission of TSWV. However, UV-reflective mulches are more expensive and harder to dispose of than regular plastic mulches, so a cost-benefit analysis should be done for each specific situation.
Fig. 11. Different types of mulches evaluated for management of WFT in tomato production. (Photo: Stephen Schoof, NCSU)
Chemical control
Despite the development and use of various management practices, chemical control remains an essential and most common method to manage WFT in vegetables. Table 1 lists registered products available for use in tomato and pepper and summarizes their relative effectiveness against WFT. Unfortunately, there are few products that have high levels of efficacy against WFT, with the exception of the newly registered product Incipio, which has excellent efficacy and longer residual activity compared to other insecticides. Also, insecticide resistance can affect the efficacy against localized populations.
Table 1. Insecticides and mode of action (MOA) for management of western flower thrips in fruiting vegetable crops.
| MOA CLASS | ACTIVE INGREDIENT | TRADE NAME | RATE/ACRE | EFFICACY* RATING | REMARKS |
| 1A | Methomyl | Lannate LV | 1.5 to 3 pt | VG | Quick knockdown activity with short residual activity. Most effective at suppressing thrips in flowers. Lannate has a 48 hr re-entry interval. |
| 1B | Dimethoate | Dimethoate 4EC | 0.5 to 1 pt | G | Dimethoate has a 48 hr re-entry period and 7 day preharvest interval. Not for use on eggplant. |
| 5 | Spinosad | Entrust SC | 3 to 5 fl oz | G | OMRI approved. |
| 5 | Spinetoram | Radiant SC | 6 to 10 fl oz | VG | Effective for foliar control of thrips. |
| 6 | Abamectin | Agri-Mek SC | 1.75 to 3.5 fl oz | F | For suppression of thrips on foliage. |
| 15 | Novaluron | Rimon EC | 12 fl oz | G | For suppression of immatures on foliage. |
| 21A | Tolfenpyrad | Torac EC | 21 fl oz | F | For suppression of thrips on foliage. |
| 28 | Cyantraniliprole | Verimark SC Exirel SC | 10 fl oz | F | Verimark is for soil application and Exirel for foliar sprays. Will provide suppression on foliage. |
| 28 | Cyclaniliprole | Harvanta EC | 10.9 to 16.4 fl oz | F | For suppression of thrips on foliage. |
| 29 | Flonicamid | Beleaf SC | 2.4 to 4.8 oz | VG | For control of thrips on foliage. Activity is delayed 4 to 7 days after application. Soil applications are less effective than foliar sprays. |
| 30 | Isocycloseram | Incipio SC | 3.1 to 4.1 fl oz | E | Action threshold of 1 to 2 immature thrips per leaflet. Most effective for control of thrips on foliage. Long residual activity up to 14 days; Incipio has a 12-hr re-entry period and a 1-day preharvest interval. |
| *E=excellent, VG=very good, G=Good, F=Fair. Efficacy ratings can vary depending on areas with insecticide-resistant populations. | |||||
The availability of Incipio (isocycloseram) will provide growers with a new tool for WFT control. A higher level of thrips control can be achieved with fewer applications compared with other insecticides, due in part to its translaminar movement within treated leaf tissue and extended residual activity for at least 2 weeks. Systemic products like Beleaf (flonicamid) and Verimark (cyantraniliprole) are also absorbed by the plant and provide protection by targeting thrips feeding on plant tissues (foliage). Both products can also be applied to the soil through drip chemigation for translocation throughout the plant. However, these chemicals do not accumulate in flower tissue; they will only suppress foliar populations. Other products like Radiant (spinetoram) and Lannate (methomyl) do not move into plant tissue and are contact insecticides that act on exposed individuals. They can also help manage thrips in flowers; however, their effectiveness in flowers varies among crops depending on flower structure. For instance, control is easier in open pepper flowers compared to the closed and complex structure of tomato and eggplant flowers.
Insecticide Resistance Management
With the registration of the new insecticide Incipio, avoiding overreliance on this product from the onset is critical for preserving long-term effectiveness. Field-evolved resistance to Radiant and Lannate has been reported in WFT populations in tomato and pepper production in several areas in NC, demonstrating that resistance can develop quickly when products are overused. To avoid repeating this pattern, growers should rotate insecticides with different Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) mode of action (MOA) groups (not by trade names) and apply them only when thrips populations reach recommended treatment thresholds. For Incipio, it is recommended that one well-timed application per crop be used, which should provide excellent knockdown activity; after which rotations of other products can help maintain populations below damaging levels.
Incorporating non-chemical tools into management programs can help reduce the need for insecticides and reduce the potential for resistance development. Reflective mulch, which helps reduce early-season thrips pressure and delay insecticide applications, is one tool. When possible, avoid planting early-season fruiting vegetable crops near spring reservoirs of thrips, such as strawberry and wheat, to reduce WFT populations before they migrate into vegetable crops. By combining IRAC rotations, threshold-based applications, and cultural tactics, the risk of developing insecticide resistance to Incipio and other tools can be reduced.
Further Reading
Integrated pest management in western flower thrips: past, present and future
Western flower thrips in greenhouses: a review of its biological control and other methods
Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips
Photo-based key of thrips (Thysanoptera) associated with horticultural crops in Florida